Google
 

Wednesday

USD Mired Near Lows

At 2:00 AM Germany June HICP m/m (exp 0.1%, prev 0.2%)
Germany June HICP y/y (exp 2.0%, prev 2.0%)
Germany June CPI m/m (exp 0.1%, prev 0.2%)
Germany June CPI y/y (exp 1.8%, prev 1.9%)
At 5:00 AM Eurozone CPI m/m (exp 0.1%, prev 0.2%)
Eurozone CPI y/y (exp 1.9%, prev 1.9%)
Eurozone CPI ex-F&E m/m (exp 0.1%, prev 0.2%)
Eurozone CPI ex-F&E y/y (exp 1.9%, prev 1.9%)
At 8:30 AM US July NY Fed Manufacturing Survey (exp 18.0, prev 25.75)
Canada May Manufacturing Shipments (exp 0.5%, prev –0.6%)
The dollar continued to struggle in a holiday-thinned Asian session, remaining mired near all-time lows against the euro shy of the 1.38-mark and 26-year lows versus the sterling. Lingering uncertainties stemming from the subprime mortgage market and potential spillover to the overall economy are the catalyst for the latest sell-off in the greenback. Although the FOMC has offered little hints of a possible shift to an easing stance, traders’ anticipation for a rate cut either later this year or in early 2008 has compounded the dollar’s woes.

Data Barrage to Set Tone in FX

At 5:00 AM Germany July ZEW current conditions (exp 88.0, prev 88.7)
Germany July ZEW economic sentiment (exp 19.0, prev 20.3)
At 8:30 AM US June PPI m/m (exp 0.2%, prev 0.9%)
US June PPI y/y (exp n/f, prev 4.1%)
US June core PPI m/m (exp 0.2%, prev 0.2%)
US June core PPI y/y (exp n/f, prev 1.6%)
At 9:00 AM US May Net TICS (exp $70.0 bln, prev $84.1 bln)
At 9:15 AM US June Capacity Utilization (exp 81.5%, prev 81.3%)
US June Industrial Production (exp 0.4%, prev 0.0%)
At 1:00 PM US July NAHB Housing Market Index (exp 27, prev 28)
A flurry of economic data slated for release in the Tuesday session will set the tone for the currency market and determine whether the dollar’s woes will continue. Already mired near record lows against the euro and 26-year lows versus the sterling, traders will analyze the inflation and manufacturing outlook for the US economy to gauge the likelihood for a Fed rate cut this year, which consequently, would likely prompt further declines for the greenback.
US reports set for release include June producer price index, May Net TICS, June industrial production, capacity utilization and the July NAHB housing market index. The combination of inflation, manufacturing and housing reports will provide greater insight into the health of the US economy – given fears that the slowdown in housing has continued to drag manufacturing lower while lingering inflation keeps the FOMC on hold. We anticipate headline PPI falling in July to 0.2% from 0.9%, while the core reading is unchanged at 0.2%. Industrial production for June is expected to improve to 0.4% from a flat reading in May and capacity utilization is forecasted to edge higher to 81.5% from 81.3%. The July NAHB housing market index is seen slipping to 27 from June at 28.

$ Extended Loss, Awaits PPI

The dollar extended loss against its major rivals as the market has not got rid of the scare that the subprime sector meltdown may spill over into the broader economy especially after last Friday’s surprisingly weak retail sales data. The euro hovers under 1.38 versus the dollar, while the sterling strengthened to test the 2.04 level for the first time in 26 years.
Though a report showed manufacturing activity quickened in New York State, the dollar remained under pressure as inflation and housing data to be released this week are expected to be weak. The Empire Fed manufacturing index for July rose from 25.75 to 26.46, beating the estimate of 18.
A bunch of economic reports from US are due tomorrow. PPI, a key inflation gauge, is expected to fall from 0.9% to 0.2% in June. Excluding food and energy, core index is estimated to remain at 0.2% unchanged. US net TICS is seen to decrease from 84.1 billion to 70.0 billion. Capacity utilization is forecasted to barely changed from prior month’s reading of 81.3%. Besides, industrial production may increase 0.4% in June.

Sterling Gained on CPI

The sterling jumped above 2.04 versus the dollar after a report showed inflation deceleration was not as fast as expected.
UK CPI headline for June fell from 2.5% to 2.4% as expected. Excluding volatile components, food and energy, the core index rose at a rate of 2% in the year to June, the fastest pace since March 1997. Another inflation gauge, RPI came out at 4.4%, up from a reading of 4.3% in the previous month. The Bank of England may need to lift rates once more in September to curb inflation.
The sterling rallied across the board following the inflation reports. It broke through the 2.04 handle against the dollar and rose to a fresh 26-year high at 2.0474.

Monday

Kuwait drops dollar peg

KUWAIT: Kuwait unshackled its dinar from the tumbling US dollar yesterday and switched the exchange rate mechanism to a basket of currencies, throwing plans for currency union with other Gulf Arab oil producers into disarray. Kuwait's central bank, which battled speculators for weeks to defend the peg, said the dollar's slide against other currencies had forced it to break ranks with fellow Gulf states to contain inflation from the rising cost of some imports. The value of the dinar immediately jumped from 289.14 fils to the dollar to 288.01 fils on the news.

The move stunned Gulf currency markets and volumes dried up. The impact would be clearer today when international markets open, said Steve Brice, chief middle east economist at Standard Chartered Bank in Dubai. Oman and Bahrain, the two smallest Gulf economies, and Saudi Arabia, the largest Arab economy, said they planned to stand by their pegs. There was no comment from the central bank of the United Arab Emirates, whose currency could take centre stage today as prospects for a single currency evaporate.

Kuwait was still committed to monetary union, the central bank governor said in a statement, after changing the dinar's rate to $0.228806, an appreciation of about 0.37 percent. "The massive decline in the dollar's exchange rate against main currencies ... has contributed to the increase in local inflation rates and this step is part of the central bank's efforts to curb inflationary pressure," Sheikh Salem Abdul-Aziz Al-Sabah said in a statement carried by state news agency KUNA.

When Kuwait switched to the dollar peg in 2003 it set the exchange rate at 299.63 fils but allowed it to fluctuate 3.5 percent. The margins were set between a maximum of 310.11 fils and a minimum of 289.14 fils, a level reached last year following the sharp drop of the dollar against major international currencies. Sheikh Salem said the switch will provide more flexibility in setting the exchange rate, thus boosting the ability of the domestic economy to "absorb the impact of sharp fluctuations in the exchange rates of major currencies."

Kuwaiti economist Hajjaj Bukhdour said the decision will help reduce "imported inflation". "The decision will effectively reduce the value Kuwait pays for its imports from countries other than the United States, thus reducing the rate of imported inflation," Bukhdour told AFP. The planning ministry said last week that the inflation rate reached 5.1 percent in the first quarter compared to 3.1 percent last year, but Bukhdour said he believed the actual rate was higher than eight percent. Bukhdour said Kuwait's measure reflected difficulties faced by the alliance to achieve their target by 2010, especially after Oman had announced it will not be able to meet the target date.

Kuwait was named as the top candidate for a revaluation in a Reuters poll of analysts in March and markets piled pressure on the dinar, betting the central bank would allow an appreciation as the dollar slid to record low against the euro in April. But the actual decision to abandon a dollar peg adopted in 2003 to prepare for monetary union caught markets and fellow central bankers unawares. "At the Central Bank of Oman we did not know about this," the bank's Executive President Hamood Sangour Al-Zadjali told Reuters by telephone from Muscat. "There was a position by the leaders of all Gulf countries to remain pegged to the dollar and we have abided by that decision," he said.

Oman cast the first doubts on the monetary union project last year when it said it would not meet the 2010 deadline. Kuwait factored that announcement and other delays in finalising the project in its decision to drop the peg, Deputy Prime Minister Faisal Al-Hajji said. The project now appeared to be in even greater jeopardy, said Brice. "One of the criteria of monetary union was a common monetary policy. Now of course we don't have that," he said. "We didn't think the single currency was likely, at least by the 2010 deadline, and we are getting less convinced that it is going to happen at all. This move reduces even further the likelihood."

Kuwait's central bank governor said his country was still committed to monetary union and was only acting in the "national interest" to contain inflation. "Until the completion of all the requirements to achieve the currency union and the launch of the Gulf currency, the Central Bank of Kuwait will continue to adopt the basket system." The statement did not say what currencies were in the basket. "The basket would typically mean the euro, sterling, Swiss franc and the dollar," said Mazin Al-Nahedh, head of the treasury department at National Bank of Kuwait. In the past the central bank did not disclose the composition of the basket, he said.

Kuwait officials talked with nostalgia of the currency basket as the dollar slid on international markets, blaming the US currency for rising inflation, which hit 5.15 percent at the end of the first quarter. "The speed of the switch to the basket has surprised some but the direction of change is in line with expectations, said Simon Williams, economist at HSBC in Dubai. "It's been clear for some time that Kuwait wanted a stronger dinar and a more flexible regime."

The Kuwait's central bank has spent the past six weeks defending the dollar peg as it came under pressure in the run-up to an April central bankers meeting to try to revive the monetary union plan. The talks ended inconclusively. The central bank warned markets against betting on a dinar appreciation and followed up by cutting key interest rates to make dinar-denominated assets less attractive. The last policy move, a 25 basis point reduction in the repurchase rate, was announced on May 13 after market pressure had subsided.

Chairman of Kuwait Real Estate Bank's Board of Directors Abdulwahab Al-Wazzan welcomed the step, saying that it would reflect positively on the dinar and would lead to reducing inflation in the local economy. Chairman of Securities Group Company's (KSCC) Board of Directors Ali Al-Mousa said that the central bank's decision was "right on the money", stating that it would enable the bank to face many negative outcomes. "The decision does not mean that the relations between the dollar and dinar are permanently severed," said Al-Mousa. - Agencies

New Zealand Intervenes on Behalf of Kiwi

After watching the New Zealand Dollar (“Kiwi”) rise to a 22-year high in trade-weighted terms, the Bank of New Zealand decided it had had enough and intervened directly in forex markets to hold down the value of the currency. Last week, the Bank was forced to raise interest rates due to soaring inflation. Strong commodity prices and a commensurately strong economy have ushered in a surge of foreign capital, which in turn, have driven the Bank to hike rates, which in turn has made New Zealand more attractive to foreign investors. This vicious cycle proved frustrating enough that the country’s Central Bank evidently felt the only way to curb the currency’s rise was to actively hold it down. The Economist reports:

A strong currency can be a curse for exporters, however. In New Zealand's case, the carry trade has given the kiwi dollar an extra upward push. With the yen nearing five-year lows against the American dollar this week, such trades may well continue.

How Does Terrorism Affect Your Trading?

Most American traders know that a majority of stock market investments have become global over the past quarter century. Even homegrown companies have expanded with overseas offices or, at the minimum, overseas clients have come on board through the Internet. Currency traders aren't immune to global trading, as the Forex market has opened to any interested trader with money to invest. While investors can look forward to portfolio growth with market expansions, they can also begin to measure how terrorism has affected their trades since 9/11.

The events on 11 September 2001 seem to provide the baseline for many analysts on how terrorism can affect trading. The day before the Twin Towers fell, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) closed at $9,605.51. One week later, when the markets reopened on September 17, 2001, the DIJA hit an intraday low of $8,755.46 and the market didn't recover for about another month. But, terrorist attacks - even the threat of an attack - can affect any market beyond Wall Street. Forex is especially susceptible to terrorism, since many targets focus on financial institutions or on major industries that represent wealthier countries.

According to one study conducted by Ohio State University, exchanges, banks, and oil companies aren't the only facilities that terrorists target. This study reveals that 75 terrorist-related attacks between 1995 and 2002 were focused on publicly traded firms and that the average loss per firm per attack was $401 million in market capitalization.

The Forex market has suffered from terrorism as well. When U.K. police foiled a plot to blow up twelve planes flying between Britain and the U.S. in August 2006, the GBP and EUR fell on the news. In January that year, the U.S. dollar fell when Arabic television station Al-Jazeera broadcast an audio tape in which Al-Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden warned that new attacks are being prepared on the US. Recently, at the end of May this year, approximately 67 foreign currency dealers were kidnapped and tortured in Zimbabwe. The police had accused them of fueling a parallel market that has seen the Zimbabwe dollar slide to bottom levels with one America dollar fetching over Z$50,000 on the black market and $250 on the official Forex market.

The impact created by terrorism differs according to the home country of the target and the country where the incident occurred (or was foiled). Attacks in wealthier and more democratic countries result in larger negative share price reactions, according to the Ohio State University report. And, human capital losses such as executive kidnappings result in larger negative price reactions than bombings that affect public populations and buildings. The investing population seems to have become somewhat immune to the latter incidents.

When such news is directly connected to market volatility, how can the trader respond to protect his investments? The solutions often depend upon whether the individual is a long-term investor or a trader who tries to anticipate market moves on a second-by-second basis.

Long-Term vs. Day Trade Investors

The long-term investor usually doesn't need or want to check his portfolio every minute, as that investor views his holdings as business partnerships. Tough times and even tougher news will happen, as no investment is immune from problems. But, if the long-term investor diversifies his portfolio, he can ride through bad news with some confidence. In fact, those down times often represent a reason for this investor to accumulate.

The long-term investor often doesn't react as quickly to bad news as does the day trader, and he may even ride out the 'storm' if the event isn't an Enron-type disaster. This reaction is based upon a fundamental basis to investing, where the investor relies more on that company's net worth and future growth possibilities. The day trader, on the other hand, often relies on technical analysis that responds to information that arrives by the second.

Despite these differences, many savvy long-term investors (and day traders) realize that many other investors react emotionally to bad news, and often the window to respond to that negative reaction is short-lived. The day trader might want to react instantly to take advantage of the situation, but the long-term investor may not react at all, other than to keep an eye on the situation to see how the market responds to the situation over time.

With that said, terrorism has created a new environment that has put all investors on alert. To examine how some markets react to terrorism, I've leaned on an Investopedia article where they examined how terrorism affected four industries: oil and gas, airlines, auto, and exchange and bank stocks. Some of their material, however, is outdated, so I've included insights from current conditions to show how these markets have changed within the past few years. Additionally, I've sprinkled the following commentaries with information on why Forex investors might take note about changes in these industries.

Oil and Gas

A 2004 Washington Post article warned that energy experts predicted a continued rise in gas and oil prices after foreigners were attacked in Saudi Arabia. At that time, U.S. crude oil futures prices increased by nearly $2.50 a barrel to close at a record $42.33 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Additionally, gasoline futures jumped six cents per gallon. Crude oil futures in London rose by a similar amount. As of this writing three years after that event, crude oil futures stand at $68.94 per barrel.

Hindsight is always 20/20, but the long-term investor would look at the difference in the prices between 2004 and 2007 and realize that crude oil futures have increased by close to 30% per year (although this past year has been basically flat...). While crude oil futures took a $15.00 hit this morning, the long-term investor would shrug that drop off as a temporary glitch, one that comes amid caution that a U.S. fuel supplies report due later in the current session will show increases in oil product inventories but a drop in crude oil stocks.

Part of this consistent rise in price arrives on the heels of the laws of supply and demand. Demand will continue to push prices up, but terrorism adds a special twist that focuses many investors' attention to the MidEast. In reality, supplies are generated worldwide. A drop in Iraqi supplies shouldn't create a huge dent in worldwide supply, but it will continue to create volatility when news about interruptions surfaces.

In the long run, anyone who goes short on crude oil futures would be considered either a day trader who can pull out in an instant or simply insane. The Iraqi War, increased tensions among all other countries in the MidEast, further hostility from Venezuela, and opposition to home-grown drilling will continue to buoy this commodity until a viable alternative comes to light. No, it's not ethanol - at least not in this decade - as otherwise the price of gas and oil would drop precipitously as demand trends change dramatically.

Forex traders might take note to follow oil and gas activity, as many times currency is intertwined with this industry. For instance, the Canadian dollar typically responds well to higher oil prices, and political tension in the Middle East and concerns over gasoline stocks in the US can tend to support this trend. An active hurricane season in the Gulf of Mexico can add to this support. And, a few terrorist threats focused on corporate oil executives should make any trader nervous about shorting the Canadian dollar.

Airlines

High oil prices often spill over into other industries, such as airlines and automotive. The airline industry also suffers a double whammy from the fact that this means of transportation has been favored for terrorist acts in the past. While consumers viewed airlines as unsafe shortly after 9/11, and as the price of jet fuel continues to rise, airlines have had to drop back and regroup.

As a result, many airlines have come forward as contenders in the stock market once again, but not without some continued problems. This upsurge comes six years after 9/11 - a long time for any investor to wait, even long-term investors. Expect more mergers, continued efforts to reduce capacity, and an increase in the use of materials and processes that make aging fleets more fuel-efficient. Add surcharges that customers pay for checked baggage and other services to help compete against lower fares offered by upstarts, and rising costs for maintaining an airline fleet might be mitigated.

Even while airlines seemed to be stabilizing, it would only take one terrorist incident to shake that market about 7.0 on the Richter scale. The resultant tidal wave could eliminate some carriers from the market totally. If you use the findings from Ohio State University to understand how another terrorist airline attack could affect Forex markets, you can look at currencies to fall in countries where the flight begins and where it was supposed to end. You might add another currency if that plane ends up in a country other than one scheduled on that flight's itinerary.

Auto Industry

The automotive industry is in a shambles, but only if you look at it from the American perspective. This is another industry affected by oil and gas prices, and the trends to alternative fuel sources have met resistance from both manufacturers and consumers. Additionally, private equity and the upcoming labor negotiations this fall could make prices shudder even more. But, SUV and Pickup sales - some of the most profitable products for Detroit in the past - are declining thanks to gas prices. In response, Toyota has entered the American market with gusto.

This industry will change so dramatically over the next two decades that it's impossible to speculate where to go or what to do on a long-term basis. Short-term trends, however, will focus on mergers, buy-outs, and shutdowns of what seem to be perfectly functional operations. China has also emerged as a leader in automotive manufacturing and has become a factor to consider. But, while this industry will be swayed by the money, it isn't powerful enough to affect currencies. Car bombs are so much part of the daily news that the make of the car used for an attack doesn't seem important anymore to the average person.

If you invest in Toyota, you might watch for online hysteria about how terrorists seem to prefer this make of automobile over any other for car bomb attacks. If fear overrides common sense in the future, Toyota could face limits or a ban in the U.S. (which means NASCAR will need to change a few things...). This is just one example of how emotions could affect investments.

Exchanges and Banks

This industry is ripe for volatility as the American dollar continues to drop and as other countries drop the American dollar. Sometimes it seems that other currencies appear strong in comparison, especially when a weak dollar challenges U.S. power. But, strength is measured by day-to-day activities, monthly and quarterly reports, and commodities. While the Ohio State University report indicates that investors rarely respond to public bombings, another attack on market exchanges or banks and their infrastructures could cripple global markets.

With that said, the investor needs to consider that many exchanges and banks operate online as well as through brick-and-mortar facilities. The possibility of an online attack, or "cyber-terrorism," aimed at shutting down company databases and IT infrastructures is a real possibility. Even more devastating would be attacks on regional infrastructure that would limit access to online markets and banks across a broad area. Even if you aren't affected directly by such an act, you can expect negative reactions that force prices down like a brick dropped from the Tower of Pisa. And, until that infrastructure is repaired, you can expect prices to rise like a feather.

Ever see a feather rise? It takes a strong updraft...

What To Do?

As the Investopedia article indicates, one of the best ways to protect yourself against negative reactions to terrorism is to avoid investing all your assets into vulnerable targets and to diversify your investments. Learn how to set stop-losses if you're a day trader, as they can protect you against a sharp drop on news. But you might think long and hard about stop-losses if you're a long-term investor. Terrorism events can equate to short-term volatility that may cost you more in the long run. It would be a shame to loose some long-term investment profits to bad news if that news is based upon a false alarm. Those investments could bounce back sharply and create a situation that will cost you unnecessary brokerage fees as well as any interest earned in the past.

But, while you can avoid risk by investing in software companies that protect Internet infrastructure, nothing will protect against a terrorist who cuts a cable that supplies Internet service to an entire region. And, while you can invest in defense stocks that respond well to fear and terrorism, you might choose those investments with an eye to how well those companies would do outside that environment. Environments often change with politics, and American politics are in flux.

Several ways to avoid high risk in currency trading are to avoid day trading in a volatile atmosphere and to avoid trading currencies from countries where volatility is the norm. Day trading is especially susceptible to cyber-terrorism, whereas some long-term investors might not blink if their Internet connection is lost for a few days. While no one can predict when or where a terrorist act will occur, the long-term investor might find the gumption to ride out a negative response to a threat or an actual event. It helps, however, if that investor has done his research and understands how investments respond historically to previous terrorist events.

If anything can be considered positive about random acts of violence, it's that investors now have access to histories that can help define future market movements. The ability to measure past activity to future possibilities is an advantage, but the intelligent investor — whether short- or long-term — realizes that there's no safety net in today's trading environment. Staying informed, perhaps, is the only way to shield profits from losses that occur from terrorism.

Yen Falls to Record Lows Today

Sterling and the New Zealand dollar were also beneficiaries of the carry trade, with the former approaching $2 for the first time since late April. Both were at multiyear highs against the yen. Unlike the yen, the Swiss franc surged higher on Friday, with the dollar plunging 0.8 percent to 1.2310 francs and the euro down 0.4 percent at 1.6565 francs . The Swiss government revised up its growth forecasts for this year and next and its 2008 inflation outlook, while the central bank let overnight repo rates rise a week after lifting the benchmark lending rate to 2.5 percent. After the yen, the Swiss franc was a favored funding currency for carry trades, but on Friday, it approached a 15-year high against the Japanese currency.


Divyang Shah, strategist at Commonwealth Bank in London, said the price action marks "an important turning point for the carry trade." "It seems that central banks of the carry trade currencies are starting to do something about what they see as excessive risk taking," he said. Earlier this month, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand tried to weaken its currency -- a favorite target of carry traders -- by intervening in the market, though speculators continued to pour money into the market to reap 8 percent interest rates. The kiwi rose above $0.7680 on Friday, the highest since being floated in 1985, sparking market talk that the central bank could re-enter the market at or above $0.77.

How to Value a Currency

udging whether a currency is seriously undervalued is much harder than you think


“MISALIGNMENT” is all the rage. A new bill introduced into America's Senate proposes to punish countries where the exchange rate is found to be “fundamentally misaligned”. It would require the Treasury to identify seriously undervalued currencies, and then, if the culprits do not take action, would allow American firms to ask for protective anti-dumping duties. If a culprit persisted with its “manipulation”, the Treasury would have to lodge a formal complaint at the World Trade Organisation. The bill, which is clearly aimed at China, follows a flurry of China-bashing proposals over the past year. But this one is different: it has widespread support and is likely to be passed before the end of this year.

Congress is hoping that it will be much easier to show that a currency is misaligned than manipulated. On June 13th, the day that this legislation was introduced, the Treasury decided yet again not to brand China a currency “manipulator” in its semi-annual report on exchange rates, but confidently declared that the yuan was “undervalued”. And on June 18th the IMF also announced a new framework for monitoring countries' exchange-rate policies. I

t will track indicators such as heavy foreign-exchange intervention and “fundamental exchange rate misalignment” in order to identify countries that are unfairly manipulating their currenciesThis activity is based on the widespread assumption that the Chinese yuan is hugely undervalued against the dollar. Yet the awkward truth is that it is almost impossib

There are three main ways of determining the “correct” value for a currency. The oldest is based on the theory of purchasing-power parity (PPP): the idea that, in the long run, exchange rates should equalise prices across countries (The Economist's Big Mac index is a crude version of this). More sophisticated PPP models adjust for differences in productivity or income per head, because it is natural for prices to be lower in low-income countries. They usually find that the yuan is undervalued. The biggest weakness of PPP is that the equilibrium is only a very long-run one, as it completely ignores capital flows.

A more popular definition of the fair value of a currency is the exchange rate that corresponds to a trade position considered “sustainable”. Thus China's large and rising current-account surplus is seen as hard evidence that the yuan is severely undervalued. A related approach is to estimate the fundamental equilibrium exchange rate (FEER). This is the rate consistent with both a sustainable current-account balance and internal balance (ie, full employment with low inflation). But many FEER studies of the yuan focus only on trade and assume that China is close to internal balance—despite its vast pool of underemployed rural workers. Even if the trade surplus requires a big revaluation, the internal-balance criterion may call for a lower exchange rate.

The FEER approach is flawed in two ways. First, a large current-account surplus does not necessarily prove that a currency is unfairly cheap; it may just reflect countries' different savings and investment rates. Second, it is increasingly difficult to define the sustainable level of a current account in a world of mobile capital. Yet the equilibrium value of a currency is highly sensitive to this assessment.

For this reason, Stephen Jen of Morgan Stanley prefers a third method of calculating the fair value of a currency: the so-called behavioural equilibrium exchange rate. This does not attempt to define long-term economic equilibrium. Instead it analyses which economic variables, such as productivity growth, net foreign assets and the terms of trade, seem to have determined an exchange rate in the past, and then uses the current values of those variables to estimate a currency's correct value.

Pick a number

Morgan Stanley uses no fewer than 13 models to value currencies. Its latest update offers a wide range for the euro's fair value against the dollar from $1.02 to $1.29, with a median value of $1.15. By all measures the euro's current rate of $1.34 looks overvalued. Sterling and the New Zealand, Australian and Canadian dollars also all look too expensive (see chart). Most striking is the New Zealand dollar that is 29% overvalued.

Fed Unlikely to Raise Rates

The Federal Reserve is back in conclave. The Federal Open Market Committee, which sets monetary policy, convenes today for its first meeting since the bond market sell-off drastically raised long-term interest rates.

Bonds remain volatile, but the yield on the benchmark 10-year bond seems to be stabilising at about 5.1 per cent, after briefly passing 5.3 per cent. Confusion reigns over what this sell-off implied about growth, inflation, and the Fed’s intentions.

Indian Rupee Surges Unexpectedly

The Reserve Bank of India follows a policy of managed float vis-à-vis the external value of the rupee. Till recently, it was mostly buying dollars from the market, adding to its foreign exchange reserves which have now crossed the $200-billion mark.

If the RBI did not buy dollars, the additional inflows — primarily from remittances, export of services and capital flows — would have sent the rupee spiralling in terms of dollars thanks to the forces of demand and supply. This would have made Indian goods and services more expensive relative to foreign goods and services and affected India's balance of trade.

CHANGED APPROACH

But in the last few weeks, the RBI policy seems to have changed. The rupee has been allowed to rise and is currently at a nine-year high against the dollar. One important trigger for the reversal of policy has been the concern about the rising inflation rate. An appreciation of the rupee would make imported foreign goods (such as crude oil and petroleum products) cheaper (in rupees) in India. But, conversely, the rise in the rupee would make Indian goods costlier abroad and cut into exports.

Alternatively, if the dollar price of exports is kept fixed, the corresponding rupee realisation would be less. Either way, exports would become less profitable, relative to home sales. This, it was hoped, would divert some export products to the domestic market. Consequently, the availability of goods would increase at home, pushing down prices, helping the Government tame inflation.

There is yet another way by which the recent reversal of the policy on supporting the rupee is expected to bring down inflation. Under the earlier policy of buying dollars with rupees, an equivalent amount of rupees was being put into circulation. Other things remaining the same, this would push up the inflation rate. Of course, the RBI did not let other things remain the same. Quite often, it carried out "sterilisation" operations — that is, it sold government bonds to mop up the extra money going into the hands of the public as a result of the RBI buying up dollars from the market.

But there are some problems with this policy. Borrowing more from the market with government bonds would push up the interest rate. This, in turn, would attract more funds from abroad and the RBI would have to do more sterilisation. A point may come when the public — financial institutions, in particular — may not be willing to buy more government paper.

Indications are that such a point may have been reached in India where many banks are more willing to lend to private investors and consumers in a booming economy, rather than to the government at lower rates of return. In addition, the RBI has been running out of the stock of government bonds as it has for long been a net seller of bonds to the market. Together, all these factors (perhaps) forced the RBI to change its policy of artificially keeping the value of rupee low.

THE IMPACT

What are the likely consequences of this policy change? As already explained, the rupee appreciation should exert a downward pressure on the inflation rate. The profitability of exports is going to be affected. Up to a point, exporters can absorb the loss, if the profit margin is high enough to start with. But if the appreciation in the rupee continues unabated, they will feel the pinch and exports will suffer.

Another important consideration is the exchange rate policy of competing countries. Since, at this time, the currencies of China and other East Asian countries are still virtually pegged to the dollar, suppliers from those nations will enjoy a competitive advantage over Indian exporters. For example, the dollar price of Chinese textiles in the US market will remain the same when that of competing Indian products is tending to rise. If the growth rate of our exports slows down (the average growth rate of exports was an exceptionally high 25 per cent per cent over the last 5 years), GDP growth rate would also suffer to some extent.

All Indian companies are not going to be affected the same way. If a company is both an importer and an exporter and its foreign exchange inflows and outflows largely cancel out, the rupee appreciation would affect it much less than firms that are either large net exporters or importers. Thus, the impact for the gems and jewellery sector, which imports most of the raw materials and then exports the finished product, should be much less. But many Indian software and pharmaceutical companies ( lion's share of whose revenues is fixed in dollar terms) will find their rupee revenue and profit margins under strain. Indian exporters of textiles and commodities (such as steel), who have to compete with Chinese products could find their competitive position undermined.

Indian tourists will find their foreign trips a little less expensive while the opposite would be the case for foreign travellers in India. As a result, the Indian tourism industry — especially its high-end segment — would have a negative impact.

Because of higher interest rates at home, many Indian companies have been borrowing heavily from the international markets at lower rates, especially for financing their recent acquisition drives. The resulting foreign exchange inflows are an additional factor pushing up the value of the rupee.

ECBs ATTRACTIVE

If the Indian borrowers feel that the rupee is going to appreciate even more, they would surmise that the debt servicing cost in rupees would go down. This would make External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) more attractive, even at unchanged interest rate differential. On the other hand, if they believe that the rupee is overvalued and can fall , then the balance would tip the other way.

If the RBI wants to limit the appreciation of the rupee in the interest of exporters, it has to discourage ECB. Given the higher and rising interest rates in India, it is difficult to do so, unless the RBI puts more restrictions on ECB. But the RBI is unlikely to do this. For one, the Government wants to develop Mumbai as an international centre for financial services.

To achieve that goal, the central bank will have to gradually remove restrictions on international capital flows and move towards full capital account convertibility. In fact, the last Credit Policy further increased the limit for Indians investing abroad. The RBI is hoping that the additional inflows will be offset by more outflows as a result of the raised ceiling on foreign investments by Indians. However, this is unlikely to happen given the huge interest rate differential in favour of India. To the extent companies are using ECBs to finance capacity expansion, this would also help both growth and inflation control (by removing supply constraints) in the long run.

So, the RBI has a difficult policy choice at hand. In which direction it will move will depend on which objective — inflation control, maintaining export growth or capital account convertibility — is given more importance. Policy instruments — including the exchange rate — would naturally have to adjust as the weights assigned to different objectives change over time.

(The author is a Professor of Economics, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta.

Canada Dollar Reaches 30-Year High on Outlook for Rate Increase

The Canadian dollar reached a 30- year high on speculation the Bank of Canada will raise its benchmark interest rate as soon as next month.

The currency gained 0.3 percent in June after the central bank said the prior month that it may lift rates ``in the near term'' from 4.25 percent. A quarterly survey by the central bank yesterday showed Canadian companies reported the most difficulty meeting new orders in almost seven years, and most expect inflation to exceed the central bank's 2 percent target.

``Inflation is a concern for the Bank of Canada,'' said Matthew Strauss, a senior currency strategist in Toronto at RBC Capital Markets Inc., a unit of Canada's biggest bank by assets. ``The Canadian dollar is going to gain again.''

The Canadian currency rose 0.2 percent this week to 93.87 U.S. cents. The currency yesterday touched 95.51 U.S. cents, or C$1.0471, the strongest since May 1977, as oil prices rose above $70 a barrel. The last time the Canadian currency and U.S. dollar traded at par was November 1976, the same month Jimmy Carter was elected U.S. president.

Canada's financial markets are shut on July 2 for a national holiday.

The central bank, which next meets on July 10, has kept the benchmark rate steady since May 2006. All five economists surveyed by Bloomberg predict the central bank will lift the rate to 4.5 percent next month.

Pared Bets

Futures contracts show investors are betting the central bank will raise rates once more after lifting them in July. September bankers' acceptances futures, a gauge of interest rates in Canada in that month, yield 4.765 percent, down from the June high of 4.81 percent. Bankers' acceptances futures have settled at a three-month lending rate averaging 16 basis points, or 0.16 percentage point, above the central bank's rate target since Bloomberg started tracking the difference in 1992.

Seventy percent of companies in yesterday's central bank survey predicted the consumer price index would advance by between 2 percent and 3 percent in the next year, the highest in the six years the bank has asked the question. Another 14 percent said inflation would be faster than 3 percent, the top end of the central bank's 1 percent to 3 percent target range.

``There are still legs supporting the Canadian dollar,'' said David Powell, currency strategist at research firm IDEAglobal in New York. ``The market is very optimistic that the central bank will raise interest rates twice this year.''

Exporters Squeezed

Canada's dollar has risen from a record low of 61.76 U.S. cents on Jan. 21, 2002, when oil was about $18 a barrel. Commodities including oil make up about half of Canada's exports.

The currency's 9.4 percent rally this year is squeezing exporters' profits, prompting provincial finance ministers to argue against rate increases.

``A 93 or 94 cent dollar has very severe consequences to the Ontario economy,'' Ontario Finance Minister Greg Sorbara said in an interview earlier this month. Provincial finance ministers are urging the Bank of Canada Governor David Dodge not to raise rates, Sorbara said.

Vancouver-based Canfor Corp., North America's fourth- biggest lumber producer by market value, posted a first-quarter loss of C$42.7 million. The company gets about 85 percent of sales in U.S. dollars.

A Statistics Canada report yesterday showed the nation's economic growth unexpectedly stalled in April, pushing the currency down from a 30-year high.

Zero Growth

The economy registered zero growth in April, after a 0.3 percent increase the prior month, Statistics Canada said. The median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey was for 0.2 percent growth in April. The economy expanded for six straight months before April.

The report ``suggests a strengthening currency has started to adversely affect the country's growth, especially the manufacturing sector, which may raise concern the BOC needs to keep rates on hold,'' said Robert Fullem, vice president of U.S. corporate currency sales at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York.

Canada's economy, the world's eighth-largest, grew at a 3.7 percent annual rate in the first quarter, the fastest since the third quarter of 2005. The Bank of Canada forecast that growth would slow this quarter, before accelerating in the second half of the year.

The yield on Canada's benchmark 10-year bond due June 2016 fell 10 basis points this week to 4.55 percent. It reached 4.76 percent this month, the highest since August 2004. The price, which moves inversely to yield, rose 74 cents to C$96.01.